Item 405 of
Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained,
to
the best of the issuer's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB o
State
issuer's revenues for the most recent fiscal year: $395,451
State
the
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates based on the average bid and asked price as of April 3, 2008:
$56,200,000
State
the
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity,
as of the last practicable date: 2,990,552,847 shares of Common Stock, $0.000666
Par Value, as of April 3, 2008.
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
|
PART
I
|
||||
|
ITEM
1
|
|
DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS
|
|
|
|
ITEM
2
|
|
DESCRIPTION
OF PROPERTY
|
|
|
|
ITEM
3
|
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
ITEM
4
|
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
5
|
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
|
|
|
|
ITEM
6
|
|
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
ITEM
7
|
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
ITEM
8
|
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
|
|
|
|
ITEM
8A
|
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
|
|
|
ITEM
8B
|
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
III
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
9
|
|
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
|
|
|
|
ITEM
10
|
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
|
|
|
ITEM
11
|
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
|
|
|
ITEM
12
|
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
|
|
|
|
ITEM
13
|
|
EXHIBITS
AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
|
|
|
|
ITEM
14
|
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
F-1
|
|
Statement
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The
statements contained in this report on Form 10-KSB that are not purely
historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable
securities laws. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our
“expectations,” “anticipation,” “intentions,” “beliefs,” or “strategies”
regarding the future. Forward looking statements also include statements
regarding fluctuations in the price of gold or certain other commodities, (such
as silver, copper, diesel fuel, and electricity); changes in national and local
government legislation, taxation, controls, regulations and political or
economic changes in the United States or other countries in which we may carry
on business in the future; business opportunities that may be presented to
or
pursued by us; our ability to integrate acquisitions successfully; operating
or
technical difficulties in connection with exploration or mining activities;
the
speculative nature of gold exploration, including risks of diminishing
quantities or grades of reserves; and contests over our title to properties.
All
forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information
available to us as of the filing date of this report, and we assume no
obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Our actual results
could differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Among the factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially are the factors discussed
in Item 1, “Description of Business - Risk Factors.”
PART
I
We
are a
North American precious metals mining company with extensive, contiguous
property in the Comstock Lode District and an operating gold and silver mine.
In
the Company's relatively short history, it secured permits, built an
infrastructure and brought the Comstock Lode project into production. Since
2005, the Company has been acquiring additional properties around its Comstock
Lode project in northern Nevada, expanding its footprint and creating
opportunities for exploration. The Company's objectives are to optimize
production, increase reserves through exploration and acquisitions, expand
its
footprint in the Comstock, and maximize shareholder value.
2007
began with the temporary closure of mining operation. This shutdown allowed
the
Company to focus on the geology to gain a comprehensive understanding of the
mineralization at the Hartford complex. In addition, the company commenced
a
drilling program in December 2007 to further delineate the ore body and to
determine the most effective process for mining operations. The goal is to
define and map the ore body and to prepare geologic cross sections to be
utilized in mine planning and as a result, to be able to build a new mine model
using geostatistics and extensive drill hole data.
There
is
also ongoing metallurgic testing to attempt to maximize recovery of the high
grade fraction of the ore and to determine optimum size to continue heap
leaching. The Company is also assessing whether if a small mill sould be added
to increase overall recovery and to determine if previously leached ore has
been
adequately leached and to determine optimum heap height.
The
exploration drilling program commenced in December 2007 with 4 drill holes.
The
Company intends to continue the exploration drilling program throughout 2008;
however, lack of sufficient funds could impact the pace of the drilling
program.
The
Company turned a corner in the first quarter of 2007 with the final settlement
of the Parent litigation as continued financial and human resource drain which
all but consumed the Company is finally over. Given the end of this litigation,
change in Board composition and continued challenges in capital raising efforts,
the Company’s management has determined that there is a need to reevaluate the
Company’s business plan with a view toward the best way to maximize shareholder
value and protection of our secured creditors. In addition, in December 2007
the
Company settled its litigation with N.A. Degerstrom. The lawsuit originated
out
of a dispute as to how much the Company owed Degerstrom for services provided.
Pursuant to a December 27, 2005 agreement, the parties agreed that the amount
to
be paid by the Company to Degerstrom would be subject to volume reconciliation
by aerial survey. GoldSpring, pursuant to prepared aerial and ground surveys,
asserted the Company had been over-billed for amounts of ore and waste which
had
been hauled by Degerstrom. Degerstrom, according to the original lawsuit,
claimed in excess of $806,000 plus interest for services provided, totaling
approximately $1,000,000. Under the settlement agreement, GoldSpring will pay
Degerstrom $250,000 and both parties agree to dismiss their claims against
the
other. The agreement is subject to GoldSpring remitting $100,000 by December
11,
2007 and the balance of $150,000 by January 31, 2008. These
payments were made in a timely manner.
We
are
actively seeking financing to meet our working capital needs and fuel our
growth. If we are unable to secure such financing, we may be unable to continue
as a going concern.
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding our current
projects.
|
Name
|
|
Location
|
|
Type
|
|
Comstock
Lode Properties
|
|
Storey
and Lyon County, Nevada
|
|
Gold
and silver lode claims- open pit test mining
|
|
Como
|
|
Lyon
County, Nevada
|
|
Gold
and silver lode claims
|
|
Gold
Canyon
|
|
Lyon
County, Nevada
|
|
Placer
gold claims
|
|
Spring
Valley
|
|
Lyon
County, Nevada
|
|
Placer
gold claims
|
Our
Comstock Lode exploration project is located between Carson City and Virginia
City, Nevada, about 30 miles southeast of Reno in an area known as American
Flat. Our Gold Canyon and Spring Valley placer claims are located in Lyon
County, Nevada, five miles south of our Plum property, in American Flat / Gold
Hill, Nevada. Our Big Mike Copper property is located approximately two hours
east of Reno near Winnemucca, Nevada.
Our
Plum
exploration activities include open pit gold and silver test mining. As defined
by SEC Industry Guide 7, we have not yet established any proven or probable
reserves at this project. Therefore, all of our activities are considered test
mining and exploratory in nature. Test mining at Plum commenced in the third
quarter of 2004. We have not as yet explored or developed our Como claims.
We
also have not completed any exploratory activities on our Gold Canyon, Spring
Valley, or Big Mike properties. We have not established reserves on any of
these
properties. Therefore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to produce
sufficient gold to cover our investment and operating costs.
Employees
We
approximately have 10 employees, including our managers, administrative
staff, engineers, geologists, lab technicians, and process operators. We use
consultants with specific skills to assist with various aspects of our
operation, including project evaluation, due diligence, and acquisition
initiatives.
Principal
Markets
We
plan
to sell our production on world markets at prices established by market forces.
These prices are not within our control.
Mining
operations and exploration activities are subject to various national, state,
and local laws and regulations in the United States, which govern prospecting,
development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational
health, waste disposal, protection of the environment, mine safety, hazardous
substances, and other matters. We have obtained or have pending applications
for
those licenses, permits, and other authorizations currently required to conduct
our exploration and other programs. We believe that we are in compliance in
all
material respects with applicable mining, health, safety, and environmental
statutes and regulations.
We
are
generally required to mitigate long-term environmental impacts by stabilizing,
contouring, resloping, and revegetating various portions of a site after mining
and mineral processing operations are completed. These reclamation efforts
are
conducted in accordance with detailed plans, which must be reviewed and approved
by the appropriate regulatory agencies.
The
Nevada Revised Statutes and regulations promulgated thereunder by the Nevada
State Environmental Commission and the Nevada Division of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Mining and Reclamation require a surety bond to be posted
for mining projects to assure we will leave the site safe, stable and capable
of
providing for a productive post-mining land use. Pursuant to the approved
Reclamation Plan for Billie the Kid, we posted a surety bond in the amount
of
$553,000, of which $377,000 was in the form of a cash deposit and the balance
was secured from a surety agent.
We
compete with other mineral exploration and mining companies in connection with
the acquisition of gold and other mineral properties. There may be competition
for gold acquisition opportunities, some of which may involve other companies
having substantially greater financial resources than we do.
Officers
of our Company
Robert
T.
Faber, CPA*
has
served as President and Chief Executive Officer of our company since September
2004 and Chief Financial Officer since June 2003. Mr. Faber is an executive
with
20 years of diverse senior financial and operational management, business and
acquisition experience, including 10 years of international experience. Mr.
Faber was named Chief Executive Officer and President of GoldSpring in September
2004. Prior to his appointment, he had served as Chief Financial Officer since
June 2003. Mr. Faber served from 2002 until 2003 as Vice President of United
Site Services, Inc., a privately held service consolidator in the waste service
industry. Additionally, Mr. Faber served as an executive with Allied Waste
Industries from 2001 until 2002, overseeing a $1.2 billion multi-state area
and
served as Chief Financial Officer with Frontier Waste Services, LLC from 1999
until 2001. Prior to Frontier Waste, Mr. Faber spent 17 years with Waste
Management, Inc., a publicly traded environmental services company, during
which
time he served in senior positions both internationally and domestically. Mr.
Faber’s positions included Director of Finance of Waste Management’s $1.4
billion multi-country International operations based in London, England and
Vice
President and Controller for several $100 million plus multi-state market areas.
(*Not licensed to practice)
Jim
Golden has served as the Company’s COO since May 2006. Mr. Golden, who is a
mining engineer, has over twenty-five years of experience in the mining
industry, including ten years with Peter Kiewit's mining division, where he
was
a district manager. A graduate of Montana Tech, Mr. Golden has owned his own
consulting firm since 1990, where he has provided consulting services throughout
the world for over 50 mining companies.
Financing
Events and Restructuring
In
February 2006, we completed an additional financing transaction, which provided
us with $250,000 in funding. In consideration for the funding, we issued a
promissory note with a term of ninety (90) days and an interest rate of sixteen
percent (16%) per annum. The default interest rate on the note is twenty-two
percent (22%). The funds were used for working capital and general corporate
purposes. In March 2006, we completed an additional financing transaction,
which
provided us with $150,000 in funding under the same terms and conditions as
the
February 2006 financing.
$2,200,000
Convertible Debenture Financing
On
August
23 - 24, 2006, the Company formally entered into an agreement with several
investors to loan $1,900,000 to the Company. In March 2007, the Company amended
the agreement increasing the loan amount to $2,200,000. The notes evidencing
the
loan bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum, payable monthly on the first
of
each month commencing October 1, 2006, along with 1/24 of the principal amount
of such notes on each repayment date and were issued between May 18, 2006 -
August 24, 2006, with the second quarter notes being treated as “bridge debt”
until the loan agreement was formally signed.. The notes are also convertible
into Common Stock at a 50% discount to market until a registration statement
registering the Common Stock underlying the notes is effective and at a 15%
discount to market thereafter. As additional consideration, the investors are
to
be issued a total of 20,000,000 warrants to purchase common stock at exercise
prices based upon the same formulas as for conversion of the amounts due under
the notes. The notes are secured by a lien on the assets of Goldspring, Inc.
and
a pledge of all of the interests in Plum Mine Special Purpose, LLC, which owns
the Plum Mine operation. In connection with this loan, one of the lenders has
agreed to acquire the existing mortgage on the Plum Mine property from the
Brockbank Trust. As of December 31, 2007, $2,170,000 of the $2,200,000 has
been
funded by the investors.
The
notes
issued are as follows:
|
|
Issued
date
|
Face
amount
|
|||||
|
Winfield
Debenture Payable
|
5/15/2006
|
$
|
300,000
|
||||
|
Winfield
Debenture Payable
|
6/21/2006
|
300,000
|
|||||
|
Winfield
Debenture Payable
|
8/23/2006
|
300,000
|
|||||
|
Longview
Debenture Payable
|
8/24/2006
|
300,000
|
|||||
|
Winfield
Debenture Payable
|
12/12/2006
|
100,000
|
|||||
|
Winfield
Debenture Payable
|
First Quarter 2007
|
331,120
|
|||||
|
Winfield
Debenture Payable
|
Second Quarter 2007
|
288,880
|
|||||
|
Longview
Debenture Payable
|
4/1/07
|
250,000
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
2,170,000
|
|||||
In
July
2007, we completed an additional financing transaction, which provided us with
$300,000 in funding. In consideration for the funding, we issued a promissory
note with a term of one hundred and twenty (120) days and an interest rate
of
sixteen percent (16%) per annum. The default interest rate on the note is
twenty-two percent (22%). The funds were used for working capital and general
corporate purposes.
On
October 9, 2007, we completed a financing transaction, which provided us with
$137,500 in funding. In consideration for the financing, we issued promissory
notes with a face value of $200,000, reflecting an original issue discount
of
thirty-one and a quarter (31.25%) percent. The term of the notes is one year.
The note does not bear interest These funds were used for working capital and
general corporate purposes.
On
December 11, 2007, the Company formally entered into an agreement with several
investors to loan $1,000,000 to the Company. In consideration for the financing,
we issued promissory notes with a face value of $1,200,000, reflecting an
original discount of sixteen and seventeen hundreds (16.17%) percent. The notes
evidencing the loan bear interest at the rate of 4.9% per annum, payable on
or
prior to the one year anniversary of the respective loan date As of December
31,
2007, $500,000 of the $1,000,000 has been funded by the investors.
The
aggregate total of 2007 financing transactions was $1,970,000.
Risk
Factors
An
investment in our common stock involves risk. You should carefully consider
the
following risk factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this report,
in evaluating our company, its business, and prospects. The following risks
could cause our business, financial condition, and operating results to be
materially and adversely affected.
We
have
incurred substantial losses since our inception, and we are currently
experiencing a cash flow deficiency from operations. Our current cash flow
and
capital resources are limited, and we may require additional funds to pursue
our
business. We may not be able to secure further financing in the future. If
we
are not able to obtain additional financing on reasonable terms, we may not
be
able to execute our business strategy, conduct our operations at the level
desired, or even to continue business.
We
have received a qualified report from our independent
auditors
The
report by the independent auditors on our financial statements indicates that
our financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue
as a
going concern. The report indicates that our recurring losses from operations
and working capital deficit raise substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern.
Inability
to raise sufficient funds to increase growth
Our
recent financings have only provided capital to continue existing operations
but
not to continue significant exploration and growth. Without the ability to
attract sufficient amounts of capital at any one time, it is unlikely that
we
can achieve profitability in the foreseeable future.
We
have invested capital in high-risk mineral projects where we have not conducted
sufficient exploration and engineering studies.
We
have
invested capital in various mineral properties and projects in North America
where we may not have conducted sufficient exploration and engineering studies
to minimize the risk of project failure to the extent that is typical in the
mining industry. Our mineral projects involve high risks because we have not
invested substantial sums in the characterization of mineralized material,
geologic analysis, metallurgical testing, mine planning, and economic analysis
to the same extent that other mining companies might deem reasonable. Standard
industry practice calls for a mining company to prepare a formal mine plan
and
mining schedule and have these documents reviewed by a third party specialist.
We do not have a formal mine plan that has been reviewed by a third party
specialist. Because we have not established proven or probable reserves, there
can be no assurance that we will be able to produce sufficient gold to recover
our investment and operating costs.
Our
corporate officers lack sufficient technical training and mining
experience.
Our
corporate officers lack technical training and experience in operating a mine.
Although Jim Golden, our COO, is a licensed mining engineer, with substantial
mining experience we may lack sufficient qualified support personnel to
effectively manage our mining operation . Without sufficient training or
experience in all areas, our corporate officers may not be fully aware of all
of
the specific requirements related to working within the mining industry. The
decisions of our corporate officers may not take into account standard
engineering or managerial approaches that operating mining companies commonly
use. Consequently, our operations, earnings, and ultimate financial success
could suffer irreparable harm due to corporate officers’ lack of experience in
the mining industry.
Our
success depends on our ability to recover precious metals, process them, and
successfully sell them for more than the cost of production. The success of
this
process depends on the market prices of metals in relation to our costs of
production. We may not always be able to generate a profit on the sale of gold
or other minerals because we can only maintain a level of control over our
costs
and have no ability to control the market prices. The total cash costs of
production at any location are frequently subject to great variation from year
to year as a result of a number of factors, such as the changing composition
of
ore grade or mineralized material production, and metallurgy and exploration
activities in response to the physical shape and location of the ore body or
deposit. In addition costs are affected by the price of commodities, such as
fuel and electricity. Such commodities are at times subject to volatile price
movements, including increases that could make production at certain operations
less profitable. A material increase in production costs or a decrease in the
price of gold or other minerals could adversely affect our ability to earn
a
profit on the sale of gold or other minerals.
We
do not have proven or probable reserves, and there is no assurance that the
quantities of precious metals we produce will be sufficient to recover our
investment and operating costs.
Our
success depends on our ability to produce sufficient quantities of precious
metals to recover our investment and operating costs. We do not have proven
or
probable reserves. There can be no assurance that our exploration activities
will result in the discovery of sufficient quantities of mineralized material
to
lead to a commercially successful operation.
The
cost of our exploration and acquisition activities are substantial, and there
is
no assurance that the quantities of minerals we discover or acquire will justify
commercial operations or replace reserves established in the
future.
Mineral
exploration, particularly for gold and other precious metals, is highly
speculative in nature, involves many risks, and frequently is nonproductive.
There can be no assurance that our exploration and acquisition activities will
be commercially successful. Once gold mineralization is discovered, it may
take
a number of years from the initial phases of drilling until production is
possible, during which time the economic feasibility of production may change.
Substantial expenditures are required to acquire existing gold properties,
to
establish ore reserves through drilling and analysis, to develop metallurgical
processes to extract metal from the ore, and in the case of new properties,
to
develop the processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for
mineral exploration. There can be no assurance that any gold reserves or
mineralized material that may be discovered or acquired in the future will
be in
sufficient quantities or of adequate grade to justify commercial operations
or
that the funds required for mineral production operation can be obtained on
a
timely or reasonable basis. Mineral exploration companies must continually
replace mineralized material or reserves depleted by production. As a result,
there can be no assurance that we will be successful in replacing any reserves
or mineralized material acquired or established in the future.
The
price of gold fluctuates on a regular basis and a downturn in price could
negatively impact our operations and cash flow.
Our
operations are significantly affected by changes in the market price of gold.
Gold prices can fluctuate widely and may be affected by numerous factors, such
as expectations for inflation, levels of interest rates, currency exchange
rates, central bank sales, forward selling or other hedging activities, demand
for precious metals, global or regional political and economic crises, and
production costs in major gold-producing regions, such as South Africa and
the
former Soviet Union. The aggregate effect of these factors, all of which are
beyond our control, is impossible for us to predict. The demand for and supply
of gold affect gold prices, but not necessarily in the same manner as supply
and
demand affect the prices of other commodities. The supply of gold consists
of a
combination of new mineral production and existing stocks of bullion and
fabricated gold held by governments, public and private financial institutions,
industrial organizations, and private individuals. As the amount produced in
any
single year constitutes a small portion of the total potential supply of gold,
normal variations in current production do not have a significant impact on
the
supply of gold or on its price. If gold prices decline substantially, it could
adversely affect the realizable value of our assets and potential future results
of operations and cash flow.
The
use of hedging instruments may not prevent losses being realized on subsequent
price decreases or may prevent gains being realized from subsequent price
increases.
We
may
from time to time sell some future production of gold pursuant to hedge
positions. If the gold price rises above the price at which future production
has been committed under these hedge instruments, we will have an opportunity
loss. However, if the gold price falls below that committed price, our revenues
will be protected to the extent of such committed production. In addition,
we
may experience losses if a hedge counterparty defaults under a contract when
the
contract price exceeds the gold price. As of the date of filing of this report,
we have no open hedge positions.
We
plan
to pursue opportunities to acquire properties with gold mineralized material
or
reserves with exploration potential. The price that we pay to acquire these
properties will be influenced, in large part, by the price of gold at the time
of the acquisition. Our potential future revenues are expected to be derived
from the production and sale of gold from these properties or from the sale
of
some of these properties. The value of any gold reserves and other mineralized
material, and the value of any potential mineral production therefrom, will
vary
in direct proportion to variations in those mineral prices. The price of gold
has fluctuated widely as a result of numerous factors beyond our control. The
effect of these factors on the price of gold, and therefore the economic
viability of any of our projects, cannot accurately be predicted. Any drop
in
the price of gold would negatively affect our asset values, cash flows,
potential revenues, and profits.
We
compete with other mineral exploration and mining companies or individuals,
including large, established mining companies with substantial capabilities
and
financial resources, to acquire rights to mineral properties containing gold
and
other minerals. There is a limited supply of desirable mineral lands available
for claim staking, lease, or other acquisition. There can be no assurance that
we will be able to acquire mineral properties against competitors with
substantially greater financial resources than we have.
Mineral
exploration and operating activities are inherently hazardous. Operations in
which we have direct or indirect interests will be subject to all the hazards
and risks normally incidental to exploration and production of gold and other
metals, any of which could result in work stoppages, damage to property, and
possible environmental damage. The nature of these risks is such that
liabilities might exceed any liability insurance policy limits. It is also
possible that the liabilities and hazards might not be insurable, or we could
elect not to insure ourselves against such liabilities because of the high
premium costs, in which event, we could incur significant costs that could
have
a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
We
do not have proven or probable reserves, and our mineral calculations are only
estimates; any material change may negatively affect the economic viability
of
our properties.
Substantial
expenditures are required to acquire existing gold properties with established
reserves or to establish proven or probable reserves through drilling and
analysis. We do not anticipate expending sums for additional drilling and
analysis to establish proven or probable reserves on our properties. We drill
in
connection with our mineral exploration activities and not with the purpose
of
establishing proven and probable reserves. Therefore, our activity must be
called exploration or test mining. While we estimate the amount of mineralized
material we believe exists on our properties, our calculations are estimates
only, subject to uncertainty due to factors, including the quantity and grade
of
ore, metal prices, and recoverability of minerals in the mineral recovery
process. There is a great degree of uncertainty attributable to the calculation
of any mineralized material, particularly where there has not been significant
drilling, mining, and processing. Until the mineralized material located on
our
properties is actually mined and processed, the quantity and quality of the
mineralized material must be considered as an estimate only. In addition, the
quantity of mineralized material may vary depending on metal prices. Any
material change in the quantity of mineralized material may negatively affect
the economic viability of our properties. In addition, there can be no assurance
that we will achieve the same recoveries of metals contained in the mineralized
material as in small-scale laboratory tests or that we will be able to duplicate
such results in larger scale tests under on-site conditions or during
production.
Our
operations are subject to environmental regulations, which could result in
additional costs and operational delays. All phases of our operations are
subject to environmental regulation. Environmental legislation is evolving
in
some countries and jurisdictions in a manner that may require stricter standards
and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more
stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened
degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors, and
employees. There is no assurance that any future changes in environmental
regulation will not negatively affect our projects.
Insurance
against environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution or
other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from
exploration and production, has not been available generally in the mining
industry. We have no insurance coverage for most environmental risks. In the
event of a problem, the payment of environmental liabilities and costs would
reduce the funds available to us for future operations. If we are unable to
fund
fully the cost of remedying an environmental problem, we might be required
to
enter into an interim compliance measure pending completion of the required
remedy.
The
Bureau of Land Management requires that mining operations on lands subject
to
its regulation obtain an approved plan of operations subject to environmental
impact evaluation under the National Environmental Policy Act. Any significant
modifications to the plan of operations may require the completion of an
environmental assessment or Environmental Impact Statement prior to a