  |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 12 Post subject: Somber..gone |
 |
|
| somberdraak wrote: | Capbreak, don't be silly. You sound like Klamka. Theck has to prove nothing. The company already proved the report wrong with its 4 years existence and positive developments from nothing to a company with revenue equal or better than WWAT and less losses.
A further basis for making this case is comparing research on many wannbee companies with the GRSR report and article. Where there are no positives and only a story for the wannabee comapnies Hotstocked is very positive. And though GRSR is already way past the wannabee-phase as a company, here Hotstocked is utterly negative. The company has clear case if they should want to pursue it. So does theck and so do I.
Whether Hotstocked is getting paid or is angling for GRSR to pay them for a more serious report or that there is another fishy reason for the negative tenure, it is now and remains fishy.
S.
| capbreak wrote: | Can we trust you will procure proof of this non-disclosed payment "theck1?"
You wouldn't happen to have a lot at stake would you? Prove the article wrong or prove hotstocked was paid or get lost. |
|
Where is this asshole now? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 13 Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | bomo wrote: | | Excuse you but grsr filed that with the sec and were given an extension without penalty thus their filing was done within the alloted timeframe. Companies do this all of the time. People here get extensions to file their taxes by the millions yearly without being crucified thru inuendos and out of context statements. Half truths will not bring credibility to your site. Do the right thing and respect will always follow. |
Now, do you see why your posts are a little umm.... suspect (along with your obssessive pumper buddies Theck's)? |
Seems some idiotic assholes are missing like this one |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 13 Post subject: Bring back those asses |
|
|
Somberdrak, theck, and bomo were pumping. Apparently that is why one of them was labelled an "asshole." The stock is trading even lower than when hotstocked put its report.
We challenge them to come back and explain themselves and maybe to the SEC.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 13 Post subject: |
|
|
| It looks like many of the "guests" were called assholes due to purposely stating incorrecting information even after the changes made. A cordial invitation to explain the reasons for sticking to that may be in order. Surely the SEC wouldn't be impressed by those numbers claimed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 17 Post subject: Re: 650.000 isn't much |
|
|
| nothot wrote: | | somberdraak wrote: | | 650.000 is ten times more than WWAT ever got for all its projects together... |
From WWAT's third quarter report:
Revised Revenue Guidance for 2007--$20-$22 Million
Revenue Guidance for 2008 -- $80-$90 Million
($50 Million Core Business; $30-$40 Million ENTECH)
Just supposing you're right and WWAT is practicing deliberate deception with wildly over-inflated numbers; why would saying GRSR has more revenue than WWAT make GRSR a good investment? |
Where is THIS asshole? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| |
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
|
| Page 6 of 6 |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Register
FAQ
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in